Riots in Melbourne. January 2019.

Riots in Melbourne. The Guardian 5th January, 2019.

It is concerning to see the rise of Fascism in Australia, but not surprising. Australia’s historical “All White Policy” attracted many European immigrants who wanted to continue living the life of white supremacists, which was being eroded at home.  When the colonies collapsed many postcolonial immigrants chose to settle in Britain and many British wanted to escape the influx of different races with alternative cultures and religions.  The escapees headed to the new frontiers bringing with them their draconian racism and hostile attitudes. Fortunately, not all Australians welcome the hostilities, but Australia’s laws protecting racial equality are weak.  Added to this, there are clear class distinctions between those who are motivated towards racial violence and those who oppose it, and as usual the overseers of the hostile actions are generally people with vested interests, politicians, businesses and the like.

Violence never solves anything, it simple serves to hide the issues behind the dis-enchantments, which run deep in the Australian psyche and which have their roots in a history of rank colonialism and its convict and working class oppression.

Book: The Invention of the Jewish People. Shlomo Sand.

This is a very interesting and controversial book. Written by an Israeli professor and originally published in Hebrew, it poses an alternative view to Israel’s claim that it should be an exclusive Jewish State, “in which non-Jews are culturally and political marginalized”. As a discourse  the work sheds a very different light on Jewish history, which both eases and heightens the many tensions Jews feel about their homeland.

Personally, I found this to be a compelling book, especially since Israel recently passed laws pertaining to who  can be an  Israeli  citizen and who cannot.  There are many Israelis who are not Jewish, should they be denied citizenship?  I think not.  At the same time many Jews wishing to live in Israel have to prove their Jewishness. Indeed, while the meaning of the word “Israel” distinctly refers to the Jewish people, this should not, in my view, be cause for exclusion from belonging to a state and having the same rights as other citizens if one’s ethnicity ( or indeed one’s spirituality  ) belongs there.   Nor should it exclude those Jews who have lived their faith, but who cannot prove their origins.   If someone identifies with a homeland then they should be free to live there and call it their land.

Historically, the Jews were destined to spread the belief in one supreme force in the universe that was greater than ourselves, (one God).  Over time, this idea has been eroded due to the many threats and insecurities Jewish people have experienced.  The desire to create a solely Jewish enclave is understandable, but it is not a solution to grounded fears and hostilities, which are neither spiritually or politically desirable.  I support the author’s view that the mythology of the Promised Land is neither historically accurate nor is it workable in a region that is in desperate need of a peaceful solution for bringing about a secure statehood for all who feel they belong in this wonderful “land of milk and honey“.

Marble Arch.

Marble Arch, London.

Some years ago, I had the good fortune of living in central London adjacent to Park Lane and very close to the grand and expansive tourist attraction of Hyde Park.  Every weekend I would take the bus to my art class, which was just a few miles away on the other side of Marble Arch.  The Arch always fascinated me, not so much for its historical value or its architecture, but because the British seemed to have a penchant for reproducing arches of every shape and size in their own environs, sometimes for weddings and sometimes just for ornamental value in suburban back gardens. I often wondered, what was it that was so appealing about arches?

Undoubtedly, Marble Arch stands-out for its grandeur and because it is a pathway for royal coronations and funerals, but how many people considered the deeper meanings associated with arches?

Marble Arch is only one of many arches around the world designed to celebrate the victories of war.  London’s Marble Arch depicts the glorious wins gained in the Napoleonic Wars.  It was an Arch of triumph and it still serves to uphold those same traditional values that suggest might is right and the warrior takes all.

Marble Arch was designed and partially built between 1752 –1835 by John Nash, who also designed much of the surrounding parklands and some sections of Buckingham Palace.  The Arch was commissioned under the auspices of George IV.  The intention was to expand Buckingham Palace and acknowledge England’s military might with a grand monument.

Following the King’s death Nash was sacked for spending too much money on the project and his position was filled by Edward Blore. Despite the change in management the Arch would still display the envisaged royal grandeur. It was clad in Ravaccione, a grey-white stone typical of Carrara marble, a material that would also lend credence to the name Marble Arch.  It was the first time any building in London have been covered in this elegant and costly material.  As it turned out the Arch proved unsatisfactory as the size of the Palace left the Arch looking small and insignificant.

Marble Arch was built as a tribute to military valour, but it also contains a grave mistake.  Either side of the Arch has a selection of winged victories accompanied by the two key commanders, but on the military side there is a portrait of Nelson (a navel leader) and on the navel side a portrait of Wellington (a military leader). Each of the ends are finished with laurel wreaths, a symbol of great achievement.

The Arch was completed in 1833 and gates were added 1837 in time for Queen Victoria’s coronation.  The gates were cast in bronze with a lion overseeing the slaying of the dragon by Saint George, the patron saint of England.

Blore’s Arch was unable to accommodate all the sculptures produced for the project so some ended up surrounding the central courtyard at Buckingham Palace, while others were given to William Wilkings for the construction of a new national gallery in London.

Marble Arch stood as the formal entry to Buckingham Palace for seventeen years before being relocated to Cumberland Gate where it served as an entry to Hyde Park.  Both the park and Arch featured in the Great Exhibition of 1851. The Arch remained the entrance to Hyde Park for fifty years until in 1908 a new road system was constructed through the park south of the Arch which separated it from the parklands.  In the 1960s the roads were further enlarged completely cutting off the Arch and leaving it isolated amidst London’s busy traffic and intersections.  It still remained a tourist attraction especially on royal occasions.  Queen Elizabeth II would pass under the Arch on her way to her coronation in 1953.  In 1970 the Arch was Grade 1 listed which protected it from further disruption.

Everyone British subject would probably know of Marble Arch, but not of many would know its history despite the decorative panels indicating the Marble Arch story.  They were designed by Richard Westmacott.  On one panel there are three female figures, one wearing Britannia’s helmet, another carrying an Irish harp and the third holding the shield of Saint Andrew.  In another panel there is Peace, holding the trophies of war. Peace is standing of a pile of shields and bearing an olive branch, above are the three victories with laurel leaves.

On the south side, the panels were created by E. Baily, best known for his stature of Nelson in Trafalgar Square. There are two figures in Baily’s panels Virtue and Valour designed to symbolize strength.

I grew up in the aftermath of the Second World War when the young people of my generation would call virtue and valour into question. Many would come to the realization that wars were created by the rich and fought by the poor and in the 1960s another war was on the horizon, the Cold War; a nuclear war that was predicted to end all wars.    Where would the inner City of London find the space for more warrior arches?

I left London and settled in Australia on a beautiful property with a wonderful garden and views across acres of green fields to the hills beyond.  I am an avid gardener and low and behold, I have found myself unconsciously creating garden arches, albeit to maintain and control my roses. I have been forced to admit that I have inherited a penchant for arches.  I may not have a victory from foreign wars, but I do have victory over my prolific blooms when the spring rains sends them marauding across my pathways.

 

Sources.

  1. Bowdle and Steven P. Brindle’s English Heritage guidebook, Wellington Arch, Marble Arch and Six Great War Memorials (2015). www.english-heritage.org.uk and https://marble-arch.london/marble-arch-story/ Retrieved 16th Dec. 2018.

 

 

Soft Plastics.

Soft plastics cause a lot of damage to wildlife. Up  until recently it has been impossible to put soft plastics into the recycle bin with hard plastics and they have had to go into the landfil. Now Woolworths has a soft plastic recycle bin and the plastics are converted into items like park benches and paving. I am committed to reclying and I am delighted to be able to put my soft plastics to good use. What is more, they are light weight to carry and no trouble to  take to the store, unlike their bigger counterparts.  HELP SAVE THE PLANET.

Back to nature.

My Spring garden has been stunning this year. My garden is my escape  from the world and a journey back to nature.  It is also Land for Wildlife, but I manage to sneak in a few exotic plants and flowers.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Bookshelves.

If you like me and collect a lot of books buying bookshelves can be expensive. You can make them out of old wooden boxes. Here is my collection of books and shelves.

 
 
 
 
 

Some of my favourite books.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Recycling.

We all like to be responsible and recycle as many goods as possible. I have taken to making rugs out of old clothes, bed sheets and wool. Here are some works in progress.

 
 

 

The Templars.

I have  been toying with the literature on the Knights Templar. Below is a sample of my interpretation.                                                                    Tarik ibn Ziyad.

In 1300 BC a great famine in Palestine forced the Jews out of Palestine and into Egypt. There the Pharaohs used the Jews as slave labour and treated them with immense cruelty.   the prophet Moses   then led the Jews out of Egypt and into the desert. While the Jewish travellers were resting Moses went alone to Mount Sinai and asked for God’s guidance.  In response, God gave Moses the Ten Commandments, also known as the Ark and the Covenant.  While Moses was receiving God’s word, the Jews, fearing their plight, made a Golden Calf for their worship.  The Jews rejected God’s Commandments and instead worshiped their old idols, Astarte, Baal and the Golden Calf.

      In the first millennium BC David, a descendant of Moses conquered the city of Jerusalem from its indigenous inhabitants the Jedusites. It is believed that David and Moses both arose from the same lineage that dated back to Jacob, also called Israel.  The two came from different sons of Jacob, David was from the tribe of Judah, while Moses was from the tribe of Levi. The Ark of the Covenant was placed in the care of the Levites.

      Below the citadel on Mount Moab David bought a site for a Temple that would house the Ark and the Covenant, but David had no right to the precious object, he was not even allowed to touch it. David assembled the materials for the Temple, but it was eventually built by his son Solomon in about 950 BC.  The Ark remained with the Levites until Solomon built the Temple in Jerusalem. The Temple site was believed to be that of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, which referred to the whole area not just the building. When the old Temple was destroyed a new one was built next to it, which has led to inter-racial and religious disputes ever since.  

      Israel remained an independent state until Solomon’s death when it was conquered by nations to the east that included the Assyrians, the Chaldeans and the Persians. The Temple was destroyed by the Chaldeans in 568 BC and the Jews were transported to Babylon as slaves. The Chaldeans were then conquered by the Persians who allowed the Jews to rebuild their Temple in 515. The Persians were then conquered by the Greeks, but due to their absence many of the regions were actually governed by Jews.  In 167 BC the Jews gained their independence, but not without constant struggles against neighbouring states. Jerusalem was then placed under the guardianship of the rising Roman Emperors who became the arbiters of power over the entire Jewish State.  The Jews could not assimilate into the Greek or Roman way of life.  Instead, they retained their destiny as God’s chosen people. This was to result in an inevitable and ongoing fight for their homeland.

      A group calling themselves the Zealots resisted the Romans, but they were outnumbered.  Many Zealots burned their possessions, took their own lives and those of their families rather than being tortured and killed by the Romans. A second uprising, led in part by the Messiah Jesus of Nazareth was predicated on the idea that the only way to a victory was to turn the Gentiles into Jews and increase their numbers, but the Jewish conservatives rebelled against this idea. Hence, the second uprising produced a worse result than the first. Many Jews were forced to flee. Nonetheless, a small number of Jews continued preaching to the Gentiles, thus a separate religion called Christianity was born.

      During the many ensuing wars over the governance of Jerusalem a group of men called the Hospitallers assisted the wounded and sick who came to their hospitals from the battlefields. The Hospitalers were so concerned about the ongoing wars they banded together to create their own military order aiming to drive the Islamic forces out of Jerusalem.  They became the Order of Knights of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem, otherwise called The Order of Saint John.    They were joined by another group, The Order of the Temple who were a religious-military institution founded by a group of warriors in Jerusalem in the decades following the First Crusade of 1097–99. The group first received royal and church approval in 1120, and papal authorisation in January 1129. They protected Christian pilgrims on the roads to the pilgrimage sites around Jerusalem and also helped to defend the territories that the First Crusade had conquered. As members of a religious order, they made three vows: to obey their superior officer, to avoid sexual activity and to have no personal property. They came to be known as the  Knights Templar after their headquarters in Jerusalem, the Al Aqsa mosque, which westerners believed was King Solomon’s temple.

      Western European Christians gave the Templars gifts of land, money and tax concessions to help their Crusades, and the brothers of the order also traded and acted as government officials for the rulers of western Christendom. They acquired large estates in Europe and set up farming businesses, travellers inns and they  acted as bankers.   In the Middle East they and their fellow military orders, the Hospitallers, faced increasingly devastating assaults from the well-equipped and well trained Islamic forces and the Knights were no match for the Islamic forces.  The sultan of Egypt conquered Jerusalem in 1244, and Acre in 1291.   The Templars and the Hospitallers who escaped the massacre at the hands of the sultan’s forces moved their headquarters to Cyprus and set about trying to organise a new crusade.

      The Templar grand master, Jacques de Molay, was in France planning such a crusade when he and all the Templars in France were arrested on the order of King Philip IV of France in October 1307. The brothers were charged with heresy, tortured and killed.

      At the time of the arrests in January 1308, there were Templars resident in only 35 of their known houses in England. The king’s sheriffs who arrested the Templars also confiscated their lands. Royal officials administered these properties and sent their revenues to the crown. The king gave some of the estates to his friends and to important nobles and some of the lands were returned to the families who had originally given them to the Templars.

      In May 1312 Pope Clement demanded the transfer of the Templars’ lands to the Hospitallers, but the king and his nobles refused to give them up. It took the Hospitallers more than two decades to gain the bulk of the Templars’ English estates; they never recovered all of the properties.

       The Templars’ estates in Britain were concentrated in the east of England and the southern Midlands, with some lands on the English-Welsh border, and there were two sites in Scotland. Their location depended mainly on property which landowners had donated; some Templars also purchased their own lands.

      Templar farms and other lands were grouped into areas of command with the larger manors holding court over the smaller properties.   Commanderies in Britain were on flat or gently rolling land, and often sited on rivers for trade and good transportation.

      In France King Philip IV of France ordered the arrest of all the Templars on 13 October 1307, charged with denying Christ when they were received into the order, spitting on the cross and exchanging obscene kisses, committing sodomy with each other, and the worship of an idol. He ordered they be tortured and killed.

      Pope Clement V initially protested, then ordered the arrest of all Templars in Christendom and their interrogation for heresy. In August 1308 the Pope reported that the leading Templars in France had confessed to “horrible things” and that he had absolved them.  According to the records, the only Templars to confess to any of the charges were those under the jurisdiction of the king of France or his relatives.

      In the kingdom of Aragon, King James II ordered the Templars’ arrest, but had to besiege them in their castles before he could enforce this. The Templars were interrogated, but failed to confess to anything. In northern Italy the archbishop of Ravenna refused to allow torture to be used and no Templars confessed. In Cyprus, the Templars and non-Templars who gave evidence insisted that they were innocent. In Portugal King Dinis brought a legal case against the Templars to recover lands given to them by his predecessors, but there was no heresy trial.  In all, the results of the trials outside France supported the Templars’ innocence.

      Much of the history written about the Templars gives focus to the exotic warrior Knights, their exploits and their demise, but there were many Templars with smaller, less conspicuous roles who were clerks, builders and community officials.  There are families with Templar origins that no one has ever heard of.

     The Templars organisation still survives to this day and as individuals they have left their mark on the most unsuspecting of people and places.   

     I grew up with the stories of the Knights Templar and their ideology of war, chivalry and the rescue of fair damsels in distress. The story is not unusual, nor is it in any way grand. We learn our beliefs and values from our parents and ancestors and with experience we see their contradictions. 

The contradictions in my family defined us, but they were not straight forward. As British born nationals we looked upon the Templars as brave and exemplary ancestors, freedom fighters and liberators, but we had our roots in the Kabbalah not Christendom and the Templars slaughtered millions of Jews in order to seal back Jerusalem and the Temple which was never theirs in the first place.

 

Templar Legacy.

In 1441 King James II Steward appointed William Sinclair to the post of Hereditary Patron and Protector of Scottish Masons. These were not Freemasons but operative, working stone masons, well learned in the application of mathematics and architectural geometry. William of St Clair (or, better, Sinclair from the late 14th century) founded Rosslyn Chapel in 1446; the construction was completed in 1486 by his son, Olivier. There are hundreds of stone carvings in the walls and in the ceiling; they represent biblical scenes, Masonic symbols, and examples of Templar iconography. There are swords, compasses, trowels, squares and mauls with images of the Solomon’s Temple. In addition to the Jewish and esoteric carvings, there are many Christian messages carved in stone. There are also some traces of Islam and Pagan serpents, dragons, and woodland trees. The wild face of the Green Man, the symbol of the earth forces and the life-cycle, is to be found everywhere on the pillars and arches, together with fruits, herbs, leaves, spices, flowers, vines and the plants of the garden paradise. Every carving has a purpose, and each purpose relates to the next, creating a sense of magical harmony. Rosslyn is the ultimate Holy Grail Chapel, and the Knights Templars were the Guardians of the Grail Family. The name Saint-Clair means “Holy Light”. Moreover the esoteric female symbol (V) represents the “chalice” of life, whereas the male symbol (A) symbolises the “blade” of virility and, if conjoined (X), it indicates “Unity”. If the two symbols are indented, or engrailed, it means “Generation”. As a result, an engrailed cross means “Holy Generation”. In the Holy Grail imagery, as in graphic symbolism, the Messianic succession is denoted by the female Chalice accompanied by the male Blade. (4, page 297). Both at Rosslyn Chapel and on the Grail Knights tombs, carvings of these two emblems are frequent. They are portrayed as a tall chalice with in its bowl the Rosy Cross (with a fleur-de-lis design); this means that the vas-uterus contains the blood of Jesus. Alongside, the Blade is shown in the form of a sword

In Britain and, later on in their exile, the Stuart Kings were at the forefront of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry, which was based on very ancient and arcane knowledge, and Universal Law. Their background was largely inspired by the Templar experience. It was under Charles I and Charles II that the Invisible College of the Royal Society emerged to be later on at the base of many arts and scientific discoveries.

It is well documented that many Templars settled in Scotland after their arrest in France in 1307, they also settled in many parts of England including Somerset. Prior to the Norman Conquest the village of Combe was held by Leofwine Godwinson.  One part of the village was known as Abbas Combe which was recorded in the Domesday Book of 1086–7 as Cumbe, when it was held by the church of St Edward, Shaftesbury.  The other manor within the parish was held by Earl Leofwine but after the Norman Conquest was given to Bishop Odo of Bayeux. It was his descendant Serlo FitzOdo who granted it to the Knights Templar. Today the  United Religious Military and Masonic Orders of the Temple and of  St John of Jerusalem, Palestine, Rhodes and Malta and provinces of England and Wales is still active in Templecombe. [1]

During WWII Adolf Hitler believed that the Freemasonry Lodges were run by Jews so he rounded up all the Freemasons and executed them. [2]    Many German Templars had settled in Palestine as part of the Ottoman Empire, what was to become Israel, but where forced to leave in 1940.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templecombe

[2] By: Bro. Shawn M. Gorley  2015  Freemasonry and the Holocaust http://www.thelaudablepursuit.com/articles/2015/2/6/freemasonry-and-the-holocaust